In one of my previous blogs, Quick Piping Material Estimate, I provided indicative benchmark $/kg rates for various carbon steel piping items, and discussed how these rates could be used to quickly estimate piping material costs.
To be able to do that, the estimator would need access to the weight tabulations for various piping items, which I mentioned can be easily obtained from manufacturers of pipes, fittings, flanges and valves.
The file attached below has tabulations of different piping items which I have collected from various manufacturer catalogues. This is a free estimating resource for anybody who wishes to download and use.
Piping Weight Tables (Excel file) – Free Estimating Resource
The weight tables available are for below Carbon Steel piping items:
- Pipes
- Fittings
- 45° Long Radius Elbows
- 90° Long Radius Elbows
- Caps
- Tees
- Reducers
- Flanges
- WN Flanges
- Blind Flanges
- Spectacle Blind Flanges
- Valves
- Globe Valves
- Check valves
- Gate Valves
- Full Bore Ball Valves
- Reduced Bore Ball Valves
Weight tabulation of additional piping items can be added to this file if required. Any missing weights for particular sizes can be prorated, from nearby weights, for estimating purposes.
The file also shows how these weight tabulations can be used in conjunction with Excel functions like HLOOKUP and VLOOKUP in order to quickly list out the weights of the various items. This is demonstrated in the “Piping Material Estimate Template” tab within the file.
The following inputs are required to auto-read the weights from the various tables:
- Item description (pre-defined)
- Sizes (in inches)
- Schedule for pipes and fittings (e.g. 40, 80 etc.)
- Pressure rating or piping class for flanges and valves (e.g. 150#, 300#, 600# etc.)
The file shows how the inputs should be tabulated and listed to make this work. The formulae can be repeated for thousands of rows of MTOs helping to get the weights within minutes. And using the $/kg rates, the whole piping estimate can be done within a few hours (or even minutes), rather than weeks.
In case of resource shortage, this tool can be used as an effective estimating method; it can also be used by the reviewers to check if the piping estimate done by other more time-consuming methods are in the right ball park. Moreover, a blank inputs table can be shared with the piping engineers to make sure that the inputs come in this prescribed format, thus reducing the time required for any re-formatting.
I have been successfully using this method for many years and would suggest that this is one of the ways the estimating community can increase the team’s productivity and provide better “value for money” by substantially reducing the time and cost for estimating.
Note: These are standard product weights from some manufacturers. Products from specific manufacturers could vary slightly in weight. If the same weight tables are used to calculate the $/kg rate than these slight variations will not make any difference.
Also note that if the design requires non-standard sizes, then the weight of those piping items would need to be calculated from first principles.


